Heritaging the Victorian Turkish bath:

creating a saleable asset

  

1: Heritaging   2: Urquhart and Barter
3: Naming the bath  

 
4. Styling the bath

Click for printer-friendly version

      


Cuthbert Brodrick's original design for the Oriental Baths, Leeds

Undoubtedly the finer points of nomenclature, as a conscious or subconscious form of heritaging, will not have been realised by too many bathers. But the choice of a bath’s architectural style, and its internal decorative scheme, were more clearly ‘in your face’—either as marketing decisions, as in Cambridge, or political decisions, as with Urquhart’s London Hammam.

Cooling room at the London Hammam

It is important to realise, however, that of approximately 600 baths so far identified, only about 20% were purpose-built. The remainder, usually owned by a sole proprietor, were in existing buildings, mainly shops and houses, and occasionally even churches.

Grimsby Turkish Baths

 

Merthyr Turkish Baths

 

James's Turkish Baths, Wolverhampton

Grimsby

 

Merthyr Tydfil

 

Wolverhampton

Of the purpose-built baths, two thirds were built by local authorities and were swimming pools or wash-houses, with Turkish baths incorporated. Their style was ‘local civic’.

Manchester Road, Bradford

 

East India Dock Road, Poplar, London

Manchester Road
Bradford

 

East India Dock Road
Poplar, London

Of the remaining 55, all save one were built by private clubs, hydropathic establishments, or small limited liability companies, for all of whom the cost of an unusual design would have been a major disincentive.

Friar's Walk, Lewes

 

Great Moor Street, Bolton

Friar's Walk
Lewes

 

Great Moor Street
Bolton

Nevertheless, in addition to the Cambridge Roman baths, seventeen buildings, or about a third, were designed to echo what was called the Saracenic style of architecture.

These are what might be called ‘set piece’ Turkish baths: Cuthbert Brodrick’s Leeds building was his own cut down version of an even grander design; Goulty’s Brighton baths, even with their modern cinema canopy, retain a certain elegance;

Oriental and General Baths, Leeds

 

Brighton Hammam, after conversion to a cinema

Cookridge Street
Leeds

 

West Street
Brighton

while in the days before every large city had at least one mosque, Hatchard Smith’s Dalston building, immediately opposite the railway station, was its own effective sales pitch

Dalston Turkish Baths

Ashwin Road
Dalston, London

If doubt remains that these Saracenic buildings sought to heritage the baths, we should note that twelve of them were built between 1856 and 1868—while the bath was still establishing itself.
 

Year

Place

Year

Place

1856

Blarney
St Ann's Hydro

1863

Glenbrook
Victoria Baths & Family Hotel

1859

Bray
Quinsborough Road

1864

St Leonards-on-Sea
West Hill

1859

Dublin
Lincoln Place

1866

Leeds
Cookridge Street

1860

Killarney
? [by the lake]

1868

Brighton
West Street

1861

Aberdeen
Lochhead Hydro

1882

London
Ashwin Street

1862

Bridge of Allen

1895

London
New Broad Street

Thereafter, apart from the Scottish clubs, Dalston, and one the many Nevill’s establishments, no further baths were built in this style—it was no longer necessary.

Furthermore, private Turkish baths within the homes of the wealthy, had no need to sell themselves. So they range from the plain, as in Cragside and Wightwick Manor, to the idiosyncratic Gothic splendour of Avery Hill.

Hot room at Cragside

 

Hot room at Wightwick Manor

 

Inside the Avery Hill Turkish bath

Cragside

 

Wightwick Manor

 

Avery Hill

There were discussions about architectural style in professional journals, especially around 1861. Architects asked whether the baths had to look Turkish, or perhaps even Roman.

The Turkish bath at Lochhead Hydro, Aberdeen

In a lecture that year at the Liverpool Architectural Society,7 a cynical W H Hay, who had been responsible for the design of the Turkish bath at Lochhhead Hydropathic Establishment, Aberdeen, the previous year, admitted that he would now recommend ‘a thoroughly English style’.

I was employed to design Turkish baths, and Turkish baths they must be; to arrange the interior as I pleased; but the bulbous domes and gilded minarets must appear in all the cheapest and most showy style, so that the Oriental character might be realised as freshly as from a perusal of Lala Rookh.

For political reasons again—this time civic pride—despite accusations of extravagance at the ratepayers’ expense, several local authorities made an attempt to follow a Turkish style, if only by the inclusion of ogee windows and doorways. But sometimes, as in Harrogate, Dunfermline and Birmingham, they succeeded.

Harrogate cooling-room

 

Cooling-room at Dunfermline

 

Hot rooms at Manor Road Baths, Birmingham

The Crescent
Harrogate

 

Pilmuir Road
Dunfermline

 

Kent Street Birmingham

But in most house and shop conversions, the internal decoration was about as authentically Turkish as Ingres’ painting of a brothel is an authentic representation of an Islamic hammam.

Nevertheless, an attempt was made to look authentic.

The bath needed its adopted heritage as a sales asset, and had to seem, at least, to belong to a tradition.

The views expressed here are very much 'work in progress' and may well be revised in the light of comments from visitors to the site.

However, of one thing we can be absolutely certain: the Victorian Turkish bath is now a part of our heritage, and it’s a heritage which is rapidly disappearing, year by year.


           

Top of the page

 

1: Heritaging   2: Urquhart and Barter
3: Naming the bath